Fitzroy Island on the Great Barrier Reef.
New research into early Aboriginal stories set along Australia's coast has detected evidence of dramatically rising shoreline waters over several thousand years. It seems that sea level about 20,000 years ago was 120 meters below its current level, rising 13,000 years ago to about 70 meters below current sea level.
It seems today's sea level was finally reached only about 6,000 years ago. Linguists have also uncovered ancient Aboriginal tales about living where the Great Barrier Reef now stands.
"In the beginning, as far back as we remember, our home islands were not islands at all as they are today. They were part of a peninsula that jutted out from the mainland and we roamed freely throughout the land without having to get in a boat like we do today. Then Garnguur, the seagull woman, took her raft and dragged it back and forth across the neck of the peninsula letting the sea pour in and making our homes into islands."
This is part of an Aboriginal story about the origin of the Wellesley Islands in the southern Gulf of Carpentaria. It's a story that can be found along every part of the coast of Australia. But these stories are not part of the "Great Flood" tales found all over the world, the difference being in the Aboriginal stories, the water does not recede and the land does not regenerate. The sea levels changed around Australia after the ice ages and it's well known scientifically. The source of the legends seems to be based on observations of events and preserved through oral traditions as the sea level rose all around the world but only here do the stories exist.
They may have existed elsewhere but scholars had the view that oral traditions rarely survive more than a millennium so probably never looked for them. Australian Aboriginal storytelling is for preserving information, handing down from generation to generation with accuracy. Of course you have to try to make a distinction from the 'fact' story and the story for entertainment.
One of the comments on this article said that "Socrates was concerned that the switch to written language would mean a decline in people's cognitive abilities." "The skills required to remember a complex narrative are allowed to atrophy when you have that narrative available in written form."
I could not read Chaucer in the original old English. I have trouble with HipHop language. I have trouble with some parts of Shakespeare although four hundred years separate his language from english now, we are still using phrases he invented. But we could not repeat his plays word for word without printing. I must admit I got a bit lost in the comments after a while, my brain went walkabout but when we read the laments about the burning of the great library of Alexandria, that is something that we, who rely on the written word, can relate to. Can we relate to the loss of an oral tradition of a catastrophe if we never knew there was one?
I still have a Sony Walkman, tapes, vinyl records but I can't watch the 16mm films of the family made in the 70s unless I go to great expense of having them put on dvds. I can tell you the family stories but with no-one to follow me, they'll die out. So with all the blogs, tweets, facebooks or instagrams of the electronic age, we're still behind, way behind, the Aboriginal tradition of the Dreamtime storyteller.
But we still have our storytellers, bless Parliament and its contingent of accomplished liars.
(All that waffling to make that one point. Don't you love language.)
It seems today's sea level was finally reached only about 6,000 years ago. Linguists have also uncovered ancient Aboriginal tales about living where the Great Barrier Reef now stands.
"In the beginning, as far back as we remember, our home islands were not islands at all as they are today. They were part of a peninsula that jutted out from the mainland and we roamed freely throughout the land without having to get in a boat like we do today. Then Garnguur, the seagull woman, took her raft and dragged it back and forth across the neck of the peninsula letting the sea pour in and making our homes into islands."
This is part of an Aboriginal story about the origin of the Wellesley Islands in the southern Gulf of Carpentaria. It's a story that can be found along every part of the coast of Australia. But these stories are not part of the "Great Flood" tales found all over the world, the difference being in the Aboriginal stories, the water does not recede and the land does not regenerate. The sea levels changed around Australia after the ice ages and it's well known scientifically. The source of the legends seems to be based on observations of events and preserved through oral traditions as the sea level rose all around the world but only here do the stories exist.
They may have existed elsewhere but scholars had the view that oral traditions rarely survive more than a millennium so probably never looked for them. Australian Aboriginal storytelling is for preserving information, handing down from generation to generation with accuracy. Of course you have to try to make a distinction from the 'fact' story and the story for entertainment.
One of the comments on this article said that "Socrates was concerned that the switch to written language would mean a decline in people's cognitive abilities." "The skills required to remember a complex narrative are allowed to atrophy when you have that narrative available in written form."
I could not read Chaucer in the original old English. I have trouble with HipHop language. I have trouble with some parts of Shakespeare although four hundred years separate his language from english now, we are still using phrases he invented. But we could not repeat his plays word for word without printing. I must admit I got a bit lost in the comments after a while, my brain went walkabout but when we read the laments about the burning of the great library of Alexandria, that is something that we, who rely on the written word, can relate to. Can we relate to the loss of an oral tradition of a catastrophe if we never knew there was one?
I still have a Sony Walkman, tapes, vinyl records but I can't watch the 16mm films of the family made in the 70s unless I go to great expense of having them put on dvds. I can tell you the family stories but with no-one to follow me, they'll die out. So with all the blogs, tweets, facebooks or instagrams of the electronic age, we're still behind, way behind, the Aboriginal tradition of the Dreamtime storyteller.
But we still have our storytellers, bless Parliament and its contingent of accomplished liars.
(All that waffling to make that one point. Don't you love language.)